Well, you argue for both, BoN, but I'd much rather have neither exposed to children.
Still, the topic's heading in an interesting direction.
Once again I bring this to light:
See bottom left.
RedFanatic wrote:I for one don't think that such an avatar is appropriate to a Blood forum.....just because well what the hell dose it have to do with blood?
There's no law on this site which stipulates that a user avatar has to be Blood based. Even if there was such an agreement by will of the people, as the Postmortem is frequently governed, what has this, this
, or even this
to do with Blood? (No harm intended towards the example parties, of course, as I happen to like your avatars.
RedFanatic wrote:Also it veers towards a disturbing mixing of Sex and Violence that feels a little dodgy to me, and finally what sort of legal position dose this put the owners of Postmortem in? are they prohibited from displaying pornographic images on their hosting? because unless you find the right hosting most likely they are.
Come now, Red, horror has had its ties in gratuitous sex and nudity for ages. This isn't even a recent development by any means and the trend continues to this day. It is simply Blood which seemed to bypass that particular angle, but many of its referential pieces are not innocent of the charge!
Oh, and Posty's independent.